While the study of military theory is obviously useful to understanding both warfighting itself and also, to a small extent, history, some of its principles are more broadly applicable provided that important differences in context are recognized. For example, organized but unarmed conflict among political units, as often happens in politics, is one application.
Business is not war. Business differs from war in that capitalism is reliant on mutual respect for rights and businesses are fundamentally productive; war results from the absence of rights and is fundamentally destructive. Yet, business shares with warfighting the necessity to organize men to achieve objectives, sometimes in competition with or against the opposition of other men. Capitalism is not primarily about competition; it is about productivity and rights. Causing one's opponent to fail has little place in capitalism; rather, one should concentrate on producing the most valuable products possible. Out-competing one's peers may result (as might going into a different line of business). Business strategy is properly aimed at producing the most differentiated value most efficiently. Contrast this to war, which is aimed at causing one's enemy to fail.
Even more distantly, any endeavor to achieve goals despite obstacles, including inanimate ones, shares some characteristics with warfighting.
In each of these cases, the study of war is useful because of its stripping away of non-essentials.
copyright © 2010 Andrew Layman, all rights reserved, 2/27/2010 10:54:41 PM, Topic: Military Theory, http://www.strongbrains.com
Themistokles, Victorious General of the Greco-Persian War